Entrapment defense in Nevada

Police can go undercover, run sting operations, and create opportunities for crime. That is legal. What they cannot do is manufacture the criminal intent by pressuring, manipulating, or coercing someone into a crime they would not otherwise have committed. When they cross that line, it is entrapment, a defense Nevada recognizes through its case law.

5.0

16 Google reviews

Michael Mee is one of the best lawyers in town. I would highly recommend him. He was very attentive to my case from day one and we won.

— Elias Manolopoulos

Free consultation →

Two elements, both required

Nevada has no entrapment statute. The defense comes from Nevada Supreme Court decisions, and it has two parts.

Element 1

Government inducement

A law enforcement officer or government agent encouraged, pressured, or persuaded you to commit the crime. This goes beyond simply providing an opportunity. It means repeated requests, emotional manipulation, threats, promises of excessive profit, or exploitation of a known vulnerability. The criminal idea originated with the government, not with you.

Element 2

Lack of predisposition

You were not already willing, ready, or inclined to commit the crime before law enforcement got involved. If the prosecution can show that you were looking for the opportunity, had done it before, or jumped at the chance without hesitation, the predisposition element defeats the defense, even if the officer initiated the contact.

Entrapment vs. opportunity: where the law draws the line

Legal: providing opportunity

+Going undercover and posing as a buyer

+Setting up a sting operation

+Asking once if you want to buy or sell

+Presenting an opportunity you take immediately

+Using informants to facilitate a transaction

Potentially entrapment: creating the crime

-Repeated requests after you said no

-Emotional appeals (friendship, sympathy, desperation)

-Threats or intimidation

-Promises of extraordinary profit

-Exploiting addiction, mental health, or financial desperation

How it looks in practice

Possible entrapment

An undercover officer asks you to sell drugs. You refuse. The officer asks again the next day. You refuse again. Over the next two weeks, the officer calls repeatedly, appeals to your financial situation, and says you would be "helping a friend." You eventually give in and make the sale. The criminal intent was manufactured by persistent government pressure.

Not entrapment

An undercover officer asks if you can get drugs. You say yes without hesitation, arrange the transaction, and deliver the drugs. There was no pressure, no repeated requests, no manipulation. The officer provided an opportunity and you took it willingly. Your immediate willingness shows predisposition.

Gray area: online solicitation

An undercover officer posing as a minor initiates contact in a chat room, steers every conversation toward sexual topics, and escalates the interaction over weeks. The defendant initially shows no interest in minors and only engages after persistent prodding. Whether this is entrapment depends on who drove the escalation and whether the defendant was predisposed. That is a fact-intensive question that often comes down to the chat logs.

Cases where entrapment usually comes up

Drug sales

Undercover buys where the officer pressured or arranged the sale

Online solicitation

Officer-initiated contact posing as a minor

Prostitution stings

Officer solicited the defendant rather than the reverse

Weapons sales

ATF or local stings targeting firearms transactions

Bribery / corruption

Government informants offering bribes to public officials

Fraud stings

Undercover operations targeting financial crimes

Entrapment questions

Common questions about the entrapment defense in Nevada.

Frequently asked questions

Nevada has no entrapment statute. The defense comes from Nevada Supreme Court decisions. It has two parts: the government presented the opportunity to commit the crime, and you were not already predisposed to commit it. Entrapment occurs when a law enforcement officer induces or persuades a person to commit a crime they were not already predisposed to commit. The defense applies when the government manufactured the criminal intent: when the idea, motivation, and pressure to commit the crime originated with law enforcement, not with you.

A sting operation is legal. Police can go undercover, pose as drug buyers, set up fake transactions, and create opportunities for criminal behavior. That is not entrapment. Entrapment happens when officers go beyond providing an opportunity and actively pressure, manipulate, or coerce someone into committing a crime they would not otherwise have committed. The line is between detecting crime and creating it.

Predisposition means you were already willing, ready, or inclined to commit the crime before law enforcement got involved. If you were actively looking for drugs to sell and an undercover officer happened to be the buyer, you were predisposed, and entrapment does not apply. If you had no prior interest in selling drugs and only did so after repeated pressure from an officer, you were not predisposed, and entrapment may apply.

The defendant raises entrapment and must first offer some evidence that law enforcement presented the opportunity and induced the crime. Once that threshold is met, the prosecution must then prove you were predisposed to commit the crime. The prosecution typically does this by pointing to the defendant's prior conduct, criminal history, or willingness to act.

Yes. Online stings are among the cases where entrapment is raised most often. In cases involving alleged solicitation of a minor, undercover officers or agents often initiate contact, steer the conversation toward sexual topics, and escalate the interaction. If the defendant was not predisposed to seek out a minor and the idea originated entirely with the government, entrapment may apply. These cases are highly fact-specific.

Inducement goes beyond merely asking once. Courts look for repeated requests after initial refusal, emotional manipulation (appeals to friendship, sympathy, or desperation), threats or intimidation, promises of excessive profit, or exploitation of a known vulnerability (addiction, financial desperation, mental health issues). A single offer that you immediately accept is not inducement. Persistent pressure that overcomes your resistance is.

If the jury finds entrapment, yes. It is a complete defense and results in acquittal. The defendant is found not guilty, not convicted of a lesser charge or given a reduced sentence. However, proving entrapment is difficult because the prosecution will push hard on predisposition, often using the defendant's own statements and behavior during the operation.

Yes. The prosecution uses prior criminal history, particularly similar prior offenses, to argue predisposition. If you have prior drug convictions and are raising entrapment in a drug case, the prosecution will argue you were already inclined to commit the offense. This is a hard part of the entrapment defense: the prosecution gets to put your background before the jury to show willingness.

Drug sales (undercover buys where the officer pressured the sale), online solicitation of a minor (officer-initiated contact and escalation), prostitution stings (officer solicited the defendant rather than the other way around), weapons sales, and bribery or corruption stings. Any case involving undercover officers or government informants is worth evaluating for entrapment.

Do not discuss the case with anyone except your attorney. Do not talk to the officers involved. Preserve any communications (texts, messages, recordings) that show who initiated the criminal idea and how the interaction escalated. Your attorney needs to reconstruct the timeline of the operation to show that the government created the crime rather than detecting it.

Think you were set up?

If the idea came from them and not you, entrapment may be your defense. Preserve all communications and call 702-990-0190. The timeline of the operation is what proves the case. Free consultation.

Call 702-990-0190 Text us

Tap any topic for the full guide.

How evidence gets excluded Don't talk to police Mistake of fact defense Alibi defense Drug possession Drug trafficking Solicitation Criminal defense Record sealing

Page last updated October 6, 2026. Written by Michael Mee, Nevada Bar No. 13726.

Talk to a Nevada criminal defense lawyer today

(702) 990-0190

Schedule a free consultation