Free consultation. Same-day case review.

Trespassing

Trespassing under NRS 207.200 is typically a misdemeanor — but the circumstances determine whether the charge sticks at all. The statute requires either intent to annoy or commit an unlawful act, or remaining on property after a valid warning. Both elements are genuinely contestable, and a significant portion of trespassing charges involve unclear property boundaries, disputed permission, or situations where the warning itself wasn't legally sufficient.

Online Scheduling

Button rotates automatically on each page load.

NRS 207.200Nevada · Misdemeanor

Trespassing

NRS 207.200 prohibits entering someone's land or building with intent to annoy or commit an unlawful act, and also prohibits remaining on property after a valid warning to leave. Simple trespassing is a misdemeanor. The statute specifies recognized warning methods including posted signs, fluorescent orange paint, fencing, cultivated land, and verbal or written demand by an authorized person.

Statute

Trespassing (NRS 207.200)

Charge level

Misdemeanor — up to 6 months, $1,000 fine

Two theories

Entry with intent to annoy / unlawful act, or remaining after valid warning

Defense focus

Consent, sufficiency of warning, intent, rightful possession

Key statutory language (abridged)

NRS 207.200 covers trespassing in two forms: (1) entering land or a building with intent to annoy the occupant or commit any unlawful act; (2) remaining on property after being warned not to. Valid warning methods include fluorescent orange paint, fencing, no-trespassing signs, cultivated land, or a verbal/written demand by the property owner or authorized occupant. Violation is a misdemeanor — up to 6 months,…

Nevada Legislature statute

How charges typically arise

Example fact patterns

Examples of factual situations prosecutors commonly rely on when filing charges. These are simplified summaries, details matter.

TrespassingHow trespassing charges come up

Remaining after being told to leave

The most common trespassing scenario is someone who was present on a property and then told to leave — by a property owner, security guard, or business — and didn't go immediately. This can happen in casinos, businesses, private residences, or commercial property. The question is whether the warning was valid and whether the person was given a reasonable opportunity to leave.

Entering property with intent to annoy or commit an unlawful act

The other basis for trespassing is entering property with a specific intent: to annoy, to commit an unlawful act, or both. This version of the charge requires proof of that intent — it's not enough that someone simply walked onto property they weren't supposed to be on. What they intended to do there matters.

Add-on charge to a related arrest

Trespassing is sometimes added to other charges — disorderly conduct, domestic battery, or harassment — when the incident happened on property the defendant wasn't supposed to be on, such as when a protective order prohibited presence at a certain location. In those cases, the trespass charge is tied directly to the underlying offense.

Property boundary disputes

Trespassing charges sometimes arise from genuine property disputes — a neighbor who crosses onto adjacent land, someone who uses a path they believed was a public easement, or a dispute about where property lines actually run. These cases often have a civil dimension that affects the criminal charge.

How to read this

These are common charging narratives, not determinations of guilt. Real cases turn on evidence quality, context, and credibility.

Defense playbook

Examples of defenses

Short, plain-English examples of defenses we look for. The right defense depends on the facts, the evidence, and how the case was built.

TrespassingWhere the defense focuses

Consent or permission

Trespassing requires that the person was on the property without authorization. Express or implied permission to be there defeats the charge. If the property owner or occupant had previously invited or allowed the defendant's presence — even informally — that permission is a complete defense unless it was clearly revoked.

The warning wasn't legally sufficient

Nevada's trespassing statute requires a valid warning before 'remaining after warning' liability attaches. The warning must come from the property owner or an authorized occupant, and must clearly communicate that presence is not permitted. A vague request, a warning from someone without authority, or a warning that wasn't actually received may not be legally sufficient.

No intent to annoy or commit an unlawful act

The entry-with-intent version of trespassing requires specific intent. Someone who entered property for a neutral or lawful purpose — shortcutting through an area they didn't know was private, entering to ask for directions, or accessing property they genuinely believed they had a right to use — may lack the required intent.

Rightful possession or ownership claim

A person who has a colorable claim to the property — a co-owner, a tenant, someone with an easement or right of access — may not be a trespasser even if their presence is disputed. When a civil ownership or access dispute underlies the criminal charge, that dispute is directly relevant to the criminal defense.

How to use this

These are common defense themes, not legal advice for your case. The value is in comparing the allegations to the evidence and spotting what is missing, unclear, or contradicted.

Penalties overview

Potential penalties

A simplified overview of common penalty ranges. The real exposure depends on charge level, priors, enhancements, and how the case is filed.

TrespassingWhat a conviction means

Simple trespass (NRS 207.200)

Misdemeanor

Up to 6 months in county jail and a fine up to $1,000. Most first-offense trespassing cases resolve without jail time.

Aggravated trespass

Enhanced penalties

Trespassing that involves interference with the lawful use of property, or that occurs in connection with other criminal conduct, can support more serious charges or enhanced penalties depending on the facts.

Trespassing tied to a protective order violation

Separate offense

When the trespass violates a restraining order or protective order, the violation of the order is a separate charge with its own penalties — and can trigger contempt proceedings in addition to the criminal case.

Record consequences

Background check visible

Even a misdemeanor trespassing conviction appears on criminal background checks and can affect employment. Nevada allows record sealing after a waiting period, but avoiding conviction is always the better outcome.

Important

Penalties can shift based on priors, alleged injury, and how the case is filed. A reliable range requires the exact charge, the complaint, and criminal history.

What counts as a valid warning under Nevada law

The "remaining after warning" basis for trespassing depends entirely on whether a valid warning was given. Nevada's statute specifies several methods that legally constitute notice: fluorescent orange paint on structures or objects, fencing, posted "no trespassing" signs, land under cultivation, and a verbal or written demand by the property owner or authorized occupant to vacate.

The warning has to come from someone with authority over the property. A stranger telling someone to leave, a low-level employee without authority to exclude, or a person who was themselves a guest doesn't create valid trespass notice. Who gave the warning, whether they had authority to give it, and whether the defendant clearly understood they were being told to leave are all contestable facts.

Casinos and hotels in Las Vegas use written trespass notices routinely. When someone is arrested for trespassing on casino property, the prosecution typically has documentation of a prior formal exclusion notice. Even then, whether the defendant received and understood that notice is a factual question the defense can raise.

How trespassing cases typically resolve

First-offense trespassing without any accompanying offense — no injury, no property damage, no related charges — is one of the more resolvable misdemeanor charges in Nevada. Prosecutors are generally willing to consider dismissal after a period of no new violations, completion of community service, or a civil compromise with the property owner where one is available.

Where trespassing is stacked with other charges — domestic battery, violation of a protective order, disorderly conduct — it tends to follow whatever happens to the primary charge. If the underlying charge resolves favorably, the trespassing often goes with it.

The cases that require the most active defense are those where the defendant disputes the facts of the trespass itself — claimed permission, a boundary dispute, or a warning they never received. Those require developing the factual record and, in some cases, presenting evidence that contradicts the property owner's account.

Quick options

TRESPASSING

Flat fee starting at: $2,000

Down to start: $750

Pricing

Reviews

Charged with trespassing?

5.0 · 17 Google reviews

TRESPASSING

Flat fee starting at: $2,000

Down to start: $750

Pricing Reviews